Via Electronic Mail:
July 9, 2025
Via Electronic Mail:
Hon. Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, doug.fordco@pc.ola.org
Hon. Sylvia Jones, Deputy Premier and Minister of Health, sylvia.jones@pc.ola.org
Hon. Stephen Lecce, Minister of Energy and Mines, stephen.lecce@pc.ola.org
Hon. Peter Bethlenfalvy, Minister of Finance, peter.bethlenfalvy@pc.ola.org
Hon. Trevor Jones, Minister of Agriculture, Food and Agribusiness, trevor.jones@pc.ola.org
Hon. Mike Harris, Minister of Natural Resources, mike.harris@pc.ola.org
Hon. Jill Dunlop, Minister of Emergency Preparedness & Response, jill.dunlop@pc.ola.org
Hon. Rob Flack, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, rob.flack@pc.ola.org
Hon. Victor Fedeli, Minister of Economic Development, Job creation and Trade, vic.fedeli@pc.ola.org
Hon. Todd McCarthy, Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, todd.mccarthy@pc.ola.org
Hon. Greg Rickford, Minister of Indigenous Affairs and First Nations Economic Reconciliation, greg.rickford@pc.ola.org
Hon. Lisa M. Thompson, Minister of Rural Affairs, lisa.thompson@pc.ola.org
RE: Opposition to Bill 5 and Support for Ontario’s Food System and Indigenous Rights
Ontario Dietitians in Public Health (ODPH) strongly opposes Bill 5, Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, 2025 as this legislation poses serious threats to public health, Indigenous rights, farmland protection, and environmental stewardship. As Registered Dietitians working in public health, we are dedicated to advancing just and sustainable food systems. ODPH is the official voice of Registered Dietitians working in Ontario’s public health system. ODPH provides leadership in public health nutrition by promoting and supporting member collaboration to improve the health of Ontario residents through the implementation of the Ontario Public Health Standards.
Public Health and Environmental Risks
The Canadian Public Health Association (CPHA) has raised urgent concerns about Bill 5’s impact on the health of Ontarians. This legislation weakens environmental protections and bypasses comprehensive environmental assessments. As Registered Dietitians, we see how environmental degradation directly affects food systems, nutrition, and community well-being, especially for equity-denied populations. Bill 5 increases the risk of:
- Air and water pollution, which can lead to contaminated drinking water and food safety issues;
- Loss of biodiversity and green space, which are essential for mental health, climate resilience, and ecological balance; and
- Reduced public trust in transparent and accountable decision-making by this government, as the bill limits opportunities for communities to participate in decisions that affect their health and environment.
Threats to Farmland and Food Systems
The National Farmers Union–Ontario (NFU-O) has called for the immediate withdrawal of Bill 5, citing its facilitation of Special Economic Zones threatens Ontario’s limited supply of prime farmland. With over 319 acres of farmland lost daily in Ontario, this bill can accelerate the erosion of the province’s food-producing capacity.
Just and sustainable food systems begin with land security. Protected farmland is essential to ensure access to fresh, nutritious, and affordable food. Without access to food, our communities experience poorer health outcomes that are costly to our health care system, which disproportionately impact rural, northern, and low-income communities.
Violations of Indigenous Rights
The Yellowhead Institute and the Chiefs of Ontario have condemned Bill 5 for violating the constitutional and inherent rights of First Nations. The bill enables development on Indigenous lands without free, prior, and informed consent, undermining the duty to consult and the principles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
The Chiefs of Ontario have warned of legal and grassroots action in response to this legislation. As public health professionals, we stand in solidarity with Indigenous leaders who are defending their lands, waters, and sovereignty.
A Call for Health-Centered, Just Policy
Ontario’s future depends on the health of its people, ecosystems, and food systems. ODPH urges the Ontario government to repeal Bill 5 and commit to policies that uphold health equity and the long-term well-being of all in Ontario.
Sincerely,
Luisa Magalhaes, RD, MHSc
Chair, ODPH
Sharmini Balakrishnan, RD
Co-Chair, ODPH Food Systems Workgroup
cc.
Ontario Federation of Agriculture (OFA), Drew Spoelstra, OFA President, drew.spoelstra@ofa.on.ca
National Farmers Union of Ontario (NFU), Max Hansgen, NFU-O President, president@nfuontario.ca
Ontario Farmland Trust, Martin Straathof, Executive Director, info@ontariofarmlandtrust.ca
Greenbelt Foundation, Namgyal Dolker, Office of the CEO, ndolker@greenbelt.ca
Marit Styles, Leader of the Official Opposition, mstiles-qp@ndp.on.ca
John Fraser, Leader Third Party, jfraser.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org
Leader of the Ontario Green Party, Guelph MPP Mike Schreiner, mschreiner-co@ola.org
Yellowhead Institute, contact@yellowheadinstitute.org
Chiefs of Ontario, Isak Vaillancourt, Communications Manager, isak.vaillancourt@coo.org
Canadian Public Health Association, Dolores Gutierrez, Communications & Marketing Officer, communications@cpha.ca
References:
1. Canadian Public Health Association. CPHA and OPHA raise alarms over Ontario’s Bill 5. May 2025.
2. National Farmers Union. NFU-O Demands Withdrawal of Bill 5. June 2025.
3. Yellowhead Institute. The Elbows are Up: Ontario’s “Special Economic Zones” and Indigenous Rights. June 2025.
4. Ontario Nature. Bill 5: A Moment to Mobilize for Nature in Ontario. April 2025.
5. Chiefs of Ontario. First Nations Leadership responds to the passing of Bill 5 with warning of legal and grassroots action. June 2025.
Via Electronic Mail:
Hon. Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, doug.fordco@pc.ola.org
Hon. Sylvia Jones, Deputy Premier and Minister of Health, sylvia.jones@pc.ola.org
Hon. Peter Bethlenfalvy, Minister of Finance, peter.bethlenfalvy@pc.ola.org
Hon. Trevor Jones, Minister of Agriculture, Food and Agribusiness, trevor.jones@pc.ola.org
Hon. Mike Harris, Minister of Natural Resources, mike.harris@pc.ola.org
Hon. Jill Dunlop, Minister of Emergency Preparedness & Response, jill.dunlop@pc.ola.org
Hon. Rob Flack, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, rob.flack@pc.ola.org
Hon. Victor Fedeli, Minister of Economic Development, Job creation and Trade, vic.fedeli@pc.ola.org
Hon. Todd McCarthy, Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, todd.mccarthy@pc.ola.org
Hon. Greg Rickford, Minister of Indigenous Affairs and First Nations Economic Reconciliation, greg.rickford@pc.ola.org
Hon. Lisa M. Thompson, Minister of Rural Affairs, lisa.thompson@pc.ola.org
Re: Strong Support for Bill 21 – The Protect Our Food Act, 2025
Please accept this submission in response to the proposed Bill 21- The Protect Our Food Act on behalf of Ontario Dietitians in Public Health (ODPH). ODPH is the official voice of Registered Dietitians working in Ontario’s public health system. ODPH provides leadership in public health nutrition by promoting and supporting member collaboration to improve the health of Ontario residents through the implementation of the Ontario Public Health Standards.
ODPH would like to express strong support for Bill 21: The Protect Our Food Act, which represents a critical advancement in Ontario’s commitment to food security, climate change adaptation, and responsible land stewardship. Evidence supports provincial land-use planning policy in protecting agricultural lands to ensure long-term land protection and a sustainable food system (1). Implementing legal frameworks that limit the conversion of agricultural land to non-farm uses is essential to preserving and strengthening domestic food systems.
The proposed legislation is both timely and necessary. As highlighted in the Ontario Provincial Climate Change Impact Assessment Adaptation Best Practices Report, targeted adaptation actions must include protecting farmland and promoting sustainable growth to safeguard the province’s food system. Bill 21 directly aligns with these priorities by requiring Agricultural Impact Assessments for land use changes and establishing the Foodbelt Protection Plan Advisory Committee, which will guide the preservation of a continuous, viable agricultural land base. ODPH recommends that the food and agricultural organizations membership of the advisory committee include Indigenous representation and young or new farmers.
Ontario’s prime agricultural lands (Class 1, 2, and 3 soils)—which make up only 5.4% of Canada’s land base, predominantly located in our province—are essential, non-renewable resources. Once developed, these lands are effectively lost forever. Protecting them is critical not only for food production but also for the long-term health of our economy, communities, and ecosystems. Evidence demonstrates there is sufficient land designated for urban growth in southern Ontario to meet current housing needs and for the next 30 years (2). Inflation, supply-chain disruption, and global trade instability shines a light on the urgent need to protect Ontario’s farmland to defend the food and farming economy, food sovereignty, and the ability to feed Ontarians and Canadians.
Furthermore, managing and planning for sustainable land use is vital to promoting access to a healthier food system and achieving community food security, both of which support health. Land use decisions deeply influence a community’s ability to access nutritious, affordable, and locally grown food. Bill 21 helps ensure that land use planning supports do not undermine population health, local economies, and environmental integrity.
This legislation also supports the Grow Ontario: A provincial agri-food strategy’s goal to increase the production of food grown and prepared in Ontario by 30%. This goal can only be achieved if we protect and preserve our remaining viable farmland. Economic development and food security are intrinsically linked, and farmland preservation is the foundation for both. Ontario’s agriculture sector employs one in nine Ontarians and contributes $50 billion to the province’s economy (3).
Finally, as Ontario prepares for a projected population increase to 22 million by 2051, bold and coordinated land use planning is essential. Bill 21 offers a practical framework to balance growth with sustainability, ensuring that future generations have access to the land and resources they need for food, health, and well-being.
For these reasons, ODPH strongly urges the Legislative Assembly to pass Bill 21. This legislation represents a forward-thinking, cross-sectoral approach to food security and land use that Ontario urgently needs.
Thank you for your leadership and commitment to a sustainable food future.
Sincerely,
Andrea Licursi, RD
Chair, ODPH
Laura Needham, RD
Co-chair ODPH Food Systems Workgroup
cc.
Ontario Federation of Agriculture (OFA), Drew Spoelstra, OFA President, drew.spoelstra@ofa.on.ca
National Farmers Union of Ontario (NFU), Max Hansgen, NFU-O President, president@nfuontario.ca
Ontario Farmland Trust, Martin Straathof, Executive Director, info@ontariofarmlandtrust.ca
Greenbelt Foundation, Namgyal Dolker, Office of the CEO, ndolker@greenbelt.ca
Haldimand-Norfolk MPP Bobbi Ann Brady, babrady-co@ola.org
Leader of the Ontario Green Party, Guelph MPP Mike Schreiner, mschreiner-co@ola.org
Marit Styles, Leader of the Official Opposition, mstiles-qp@ndp.on.ca
John Fraser, Leader Third Party, jfraser.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org
References:
1. Ontario Dietitians in Public Health. Rapid Review: Municipal Land Use Planning Policies that Promote Equitable and Sustainable Food Systems. Ontario: Ontario Dietitians in Public Health. 2024.
2. The Alliance for a Liveable Ontario. Province poised to deliver fatal blow to agriculture and the environment while worsening the housing crisis. 2023.
3. Ontario Federation of Agriculture. Agriculture Matters: A guide for municipal councillors and staff. 2024
July 27, 2023
Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
Re: ERO 019-6813 – Review of proposed policies adapted from A Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement to form a new provincial planning policy instrument.
Please accept this submission in response to the proposed Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) on behalf of the Ontario Dietitians in Public Health (ODPH) Food Systems Workgroup. ODPH is the independent and official voice of Registered Dietitians working in the Ontario public health system. ODPH provides leadership in public health nutrition by promoting and supporting member collaboration to improve the health of Ontario residents through the implementation of the Ontario Public Health Standards.
Dietetic practice includes “assessing, promoting, protecting, and enhancing health, and the prevention of nutrition-related diseases in populations.”1 A strong food supply in Ontario is critical in preventing nutrition-related diseases and ultimately supports population health. The proposed PPS plays a direct role in the development of a sustainable food system, climate change adaptation and mitigation, and the future health of Ontarians.
In order to prioritize population health and health equity in a new province-wide planning policy instrument that combines the current PPS and A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (APTG), it is essential to retain and/or incorporate the following core components2:
- Creating communities that are compact, comprehensive, environmentally friendly, and food secure;
- Enhancing climate resilience through adaptation and mitigation strategies;
- Engaging meaningfully with Indigenous communities;
- Ensuring public health and safety;
- Promoting affordable and accessible housing;
- Protecting the environment, including providing access to green spaces;
- Establishing multimodal transportation systems that prioritize active transportation and public transit;
- Developing community infrastructure that considers both essential services, such as water and wastewater management and transportation, and social infrastructure, such as public spaces, community planning aspects that foster social connections and community engagement and includes all individuals.
Sustainable Food Systems
A sustainable food system delivers community food security and nutrition to ensure that economic, social, and environmental bases for future generations are not compromised. It is critical to supporting nutritious diets and creating healthy communities. The way food is produced, distributed, processed, and sold within a region impacts food choices and nutrition related health outcomes. Communities that have access to a sustainable supply of healthy, and locally grown and processed food are thought to be less susceptible to external factors that can influence the nutritional quality and/or quantity of available foods.3
Ensuring community food security, a key outcome of sustainable food systems, requires that a variety of elements be addressed.4 Some of these elements are outlined below with respect to how the proposed PPS will negatively impact a sustainable food system in Ontario.
- Availability means that a diverse food supply and adequate food infrastructure is in place. As per section 4.3.3 of the proposed PPS, residential lots will be created on prime agricultural land. This impacts Ontario’s food system and the ability of the province to meet this demand. Ontario’s agricultural lands are a finite and shrinking resource, making up less than five percent of all provincial land, and is currently being lost at a rate of 319 acres per day.5 These losses are not sustainable, and it’s vital that Ontario has a strong, viable and sustainable supply of food products grown, harvested, and processed locally.6 Policies must be in place to encourage farmers to grow food. Instead, the proposed policy will make it difficult for farmers as they will be competing with developers. However, anecdotal reports state that the PPS will remove the creation of residential lots on prime agricultural land; ODPH supports this change. Evidence demonstrates there is sufficient land designated for urban growth in southern Ontario to meet current housing needs and for the next 30 years.7
- Accessibility ensures that everyone has physical access to adequate and acceptable food. Evidence indicates that compact, complete communities facilitate economic growth, sufficient land use, opportunities for recreation, and access to food. The proposed policy will encourage sprawled development that will fragment and isolate farm communities, reducing access to food.
- Affordability means everyone has adequate income to purchase foods that meet cultural and personal preferences. The proposed policy will remove measures that require developers to build diverse housing types that Ontarians can afford. Inflation, supply- chain disruption, and climate-related events in recent years have highlighted the urgent need for both affordable housing and the protection of farmlands. Reducing the availability of affordable housing will add to the growing problem of food insecurity: the inability to afford food due to inadequate or insecure income. The proportion of Ontarians living in food insecure households in 2021 was 19.2% or 2.8 million people. This represents the highest rates recorded since monitoring of this problem began in Canada in 2005.8
- Acceptability ensures that the food system meets cultural preferences and needs. To ensure a sustainable food system, the unique role and inherent rights of Indigenous peoples must be recognized, which includes access to traditional lands.
Climate Change
Healthy communities enhance and promote health and well-being while being resilient to climate change. Ontario must manage its resources in a sustainable manner to conserve biodiversity and protect public health, which includes preparing for a changing climate. Public health has a significant role in climate change adaptation and mitigation as they work with various partners, including municipalities, “to reduce exposure to health hazards and promote the development of healthy built and natural environments that support health and mitigate existing and emerging risks, including the impacts of a changing climate.”9
The frequency of extreme weather events has increased in recent years10 and these events negatively impact our agricultural sector by decreasing crop yield, availability, and quality.11 The proposed PPS, although recognizes the importance of climate change mitigation, generalizes the policy approach through “balancing housing with resources” and “developing approaches” to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The current PPS and APTG has stronger policy language and direction around climate change adaptation, mitigation, vulnerabilities, and increased resiliency in order to support healthy communities.
Dietitians in public health recognize the strong connection between food and climate change. As noted in ODPH’s response to Bill 23, “food is grown, harvested, and processed in our communities and the lands and waters that surround them — our continued [community] food security relies on us doing so in a sustainable manner. In the face of a rapidly changing climate and uncertain seasonal weather patterns, the disruption of complex wetland systems can have massive impacts on above- and below-ground waterways, and the production potential of adjacent agricultural lands. Further, disruptions to long food supply-chains, increased transportation expenses, crop failure in other parts of the world, and the need to limit our use of carbon-based fuels, require us to increase [community] food security by deepening our access to sustainably produced, [and] locally grown food.”12
From a food systems perspective, to ensure community food security, climate change must be recognized across many aspects of land-use planning.3 ODPH recommends that climate change mitigation and adaptation policies be integrated into policies for infrastructure and facilities, transportation, water, stormwater management, and agriculture. As well, policies for natural and human-made hazards must include public health and safety for all climate-related hazards (i.e. extreme heat, extreme windstorms, drought, wildfires).
Health and Well-being of Ontarians
As mentioned above, almost 1 in 5 Ontario households are experiencing food insecurity. In our response to consultation on Bill 23, we highlighted the ecological and human health implications of urban sprawl and development. “Individuals and families are also increasingly needing to choose between the rising cost of housing and the rising costs of food. Inflation and supply-chain disruption in recent years shines a light on the urgent need for both affordable housing and to protect all foodlands and farmlands as key components of our current and future food security.”12 Appropriate land-use planning and protection of lands can promote health in all dimensions: physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual.
Previous iterations of the PPS and Growth Plans explicitly recognized the health and well-being of Ontarians (see attached appendix for examples), and how healthy communities and natural environments are interconnected with human health. ODPH echoes concerns raised by others, including the Ontario Public Health Association, that the merging of the PPS and APTG disintegrates the original intentions of these documents, and many essential, health-promoting components to support climate resiliency and a sustainable food system in Ontario. In consideration of a new provincial planning policy instrument, we urge the Province to consider the inclusion of the following policies as proposed by the Ontario Public Health Association13:
- Prevent unsustainable urban expansion and fragmentation of agricultural lands.
- Integrate affordability targets for low- and moderate-income households to support equity and promote housing affordability for all.
- Strengthen policies that will help communities mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to climate change.
- Mitigate exposure to incompatible land uses and harmful levels of pollution.
- Re-integrate health and well-being concepts in the Vision and in Chapter 2 “Building Homes, Sustaining Strong and Competitive Communities”, with the goal of creating healthy communities that enable people to thrive.
Sincerely,
Laura Abbasi, RD
ODPH Executive Co-Chair Year 2
Sharmini Balakrishnan, MPH, RD
ODPH Food Systems Workgroup Co-Chair
References:
- College of Dietitians of Ontario. “Definition of Practicing Dietetics.” College of Dietitians of Ontario, https://www.collegeofdietitians.org/programs/practice-advisory/standards- guidelines/definition-of-practising-dietetics.aspx?viewmode=0.
- Ontario Public Health Association. Review of A Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement. 2022. OPHA, https://opha.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/OPHAs- submission-on-ERO-019-6177-%E2%80%93-Review-of-A-Place-to-Grow-and-Provincial- Policy-Statement_Dec_23_2022.pdf?ext=pdf.
- Peterborough Public Health. Health in Official Plans: A Toolkit 2018 Submission to the County of Peterborough Official Plan Review. 2018. PPH, https://www.peterboroughpublichealth.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/PPH-County- OP-submission-DESIGNED-180425-FINAL.pdf.
- BC Centre for Disease Control. Defining food security & food insecurity in British Columbia. 2022. BCCDC, http://www.bccdc.ca/Documents/FoodSecurity_FoodInsecurity_Definitions_FINAL.pdf.
- Statistics Canada. Census of Agriculture. 2021. Statistics Canada, https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3210015301&pickMembers%5 B0%5D=1.7&cubeTimeFrame.startYear=2001&cubeTimeFrame.endYear=2021&referenc ePeriods=20010101%2C20210101.
- Ontario Federation of Agriculture. “OFA submission to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing regarding the review of A Place to Grow (APTG) and Provincial Policy Statement (PPS).” Ontario Federation of Agriculture, 2023, https://ofa.on.ca/resources/ofa-submission-to-the-ontario-ministry-of-municipal-affairs- and-housing-regarding-the-review-of-a-place-to-grow-aptg-and-provincial-policy- statement-pps/.
- The Alliance for a Liveable Ontario. Province poised to deliver fatal blow to agriculture and the environment while worsening the housing crisis. 2023, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1- OmmnZPePP1Hy9HWtDFNElbMyaXggEOA/view?pli=1.
- PROOF. “New data on household food insecurity in 2022.” PROOF | Food Insecurity, 2023, https://proof.utoronto.ca/2023/new-data-on-household-food-insecurity-in-2022/.
- Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Healthy Environments and Climate Change Guideline, 2018. 2018. Ontario Public Health Standards, https://health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/oph_standards/docs/protocols_guidelines/Healthy_Environments_and_Climate_Change_Guideline_2018_en.pdf
- Government of Canada. “Changes in temperature.” Canada.ca, 2019, https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate- change/canadian-centre-climate-services/basics/trends-projections/changes- temperature.html.
- Willet, W et al. “Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.” Lancet, vol. 393, no. 10170, 2019, pp. 447-492, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31788-4/fulltext.
- Ontario Dietitians in Public Health. The implications of Bill 23 on Ontario food systems and food insecurity. 2022. ODPH, https://www.odph.ca/upload/membership/document/2022-11/odph-bill-23-standing- committee-on-heritage-infrastructure-and-c.pdf#upload/membership/document/2022- 11/odph-bill-23-standing-committee-on-heritage-infrastructure-and-c.pdf.
- Ontario Public Health Association. RE: ERO 019-6813 – Review of proposed policies adapted from ‘A Place to Grow’ and ‘Provincial Policy Statement’ to form a new provincial planning policy instrument. 2023. OPHA, https://opha.on.ca/wp- content/uploads/2023/07/OPHAs-submission-incl-appendix-re-ERO-019- 6813_July_26_2023.pdf?ext=pdf.
Appendix: Past Examples of Health Promoting Language in PPS and Growth Plans
Examples of healthy food systems language from the 2017 Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe:
2.2.1. Managing Growth (p 14)
4. Applying the policies of this Plan will support the achievement of complete communities that:
d) expand convenient access to:
iv. healthy local affordable food options including through urban agriculture
6.2.6. Agricultural System (p46)
7. Municipalities are encouraged to implement regional agri-food strategies and other approaches to sustain and enhance the Agricultural System and the long-term economic prosperity and viability of the agri-food sector, including the maintenance and improvement of the agri-food network by:
a) providing opportunities to support access to healthy, local, and affordable food, urban and near-urban agriculture, food system planning and promoting the sustainability of agricultural, agri-food, and agri-product businesses while protecting agricultural resources and minimizing land use conflicts
4.2.10 Climate Change (p52)
1. Upper- and single-tier municipalities will develop policies in their official plans to identify actions that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change adaptation goals, aligned with the Ontario Climate Change Strategy, 2015 and the Climate Change Action Plan, 2016 that will include:
g) promoting local food, food security, and soil health, and protecting the agricultural land base
4.2.5. Public Open Space (p46)
2. Municipalities are encouraged to establish an open space system within settlement areas, which may include opportunities for urban agriculture, rooftop gardens, commu
June 16, 2023
The Hon. Marie-Claude Bibeau Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food
via email: marie-claude.bibeau@parl.gc.ca
Dear Minister Bibeau,
Ontario Dietitians in Public Health (ODPH), the independent and official voice of Registered Dietitians working in Ontario’s public health system, is writing to you to express concern about the Local Food Infrastructure Fund (LFIF), the only federal program “designed to reduce food insecurity.”
In May 2023, Statistics Canada released data from the 2021 Canadian Income Survey indicating 18.4% of Canadians or 6.9 million people in the ten provinces lived in households that experienced marginal, moderate or severe food insecurity, up from 15.7% or 5.8 million people in 2020. The proportion of Ontarians living in food insecure households in 2021 was 19.2% or
2.8 million people. These represent the highest rates recorded since monitoring of this problem began in Canada in 2005.
Food insecurity is not a food problem that can be solved or reduced by food charity or community food programs as discussed in our Position Statement and Recommendations on Responses to Food Insecurity. Only about 20% of people who experience food insecurity use food banks and for those who do, using food banks does not make them food secure. Food insecurity is a highly sensitive measure of material deprivation and is reflective of inadequate incomes that have not kept pace with exponential increases to basic costs of living including housing and food. Even with expansion and improvements to food charities and community food programs, the extent of the problem in Canada is simply too massive for these programs to be effective at reducing food insecurity.
Canadian research shows food insecurity can be effectively reduced by policies that improve the financial circumstances of low-income households. Two of Canada’s most prominent social programs, the Canada Child Benefit and public pensions for seniors (Old Age Security and Guaranteed Income Supplement) demonstrate effectiveness in improving the stability and adequacy of households’ income. These examples provide strong evidence that a basic income for working-age Canadians would be effective at reducing food insecurity on a population level. Since 2016, ODPH (formerly OSNPPH) has urged the Federal Government to adopt a basic income guarantee.
The Grocery Rebate for Canadians included in the 2023 Federal Budget as a direct cash transfer to low income Canadians is a positive step and acknowledges food insecurity as an income problem. However, a one-time cash transfer of $234 for a single person and $467 for a family of four falls far-short of making up for the almost 10% increase in the price of food purchased from stores in 2022 – the highest rate of food inflation in Canada since 1981.
Furthermore, a one-time benefit cannot address the chronic inadequacy of public income supports and wages underlying the persistence of food insecurity in this country.
For the Food Policy for Canada to reach its target to end hunger and ensure access by all Canadians by 2030, it is imperative to immediately implement and evaluate income support programs specifically designed to reduce food insecurity. ODPH concurs that Canada’s national food policy is at risk of enshrining a two-tiered food system through the Local Food Infrastructure Fund whereby “affluent Canadians purchase premium products at supermarkets, farmers’ markets and designer food outlets, while millions of others line up to receive rations from volunteers working feverishly to distribute the food rejected from that retail system.”
ODPH follows emerging evidence about food insecurity in Canada closely. Please consider the information provided in this letter about the need to prioritize adequate income supports that can effectively reduce food insecurity on a population level. ODPH strongly urges the Government of Canada to implement the recommendations specified in our Position Statement and Recommendations on Responses to Food Insecurity. Thank you for taking the time to review this letter.
Sincerely,
Erin Reyce, RD
Co-chair, ODPH Food Insecurity Workgroup
Laura Abbasi, RD
Co-chair, ODPH Executive Committee
Copies to:
The Hon. Karina Gould
Minister of Families, Children and Social Development via email: karina.gould@parl.gc.ca
The Hon. Jean-Yves Duclos Minister of Health
via email: jean-yves.duclos@parl.gc.ca
The Right Hon. Justin Trudeau
Office of the Prime Minister of Canada
via email: justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca
To: Standing Committee on Heritage, Infrastructure and Cultural Policy
Re: The implications of Bill 23 on Ontario food systems and food insecurity From: Food Systems Workgroup, Ontario Dietitians in Public Health
Date: November 17, 2022
Please accept this submission in response to Bill-23 More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 on behalf of the Food Systems Workgroup of the Ontario Dietitians in Public Health (ODPH). ODPH is the independent and official voice of Registered Dietitians working in the Ontario public health system. ODPH provides leadership in public health nutrition by promoting and supporting member collaboration to improve the health of Ontario residents through the implementation of the Ontario Public Health Standards.
We support and recognize the need for Ontario to develop more affordable housing, however, express concern on the impacts Bill 23 will have on food insecurity in Ontario. This includes the long-term implications of lost farmland and delicate ecosystems on the resilience of our food system, but also on the affordability of housing and food, and therefore the cost of health, living and well-being for citizens of Ontario.
With Bill 23, the Ontario government is proposing to address a crisis in housing by stripping away measures that place any constraints on uncontrolled urban development and protect our non-renewable land resources—including farmland, wetlands, greenspaces and foodlands. This poses a harmful impact on our environment, our lands, and our waters, and therefore, a negative impact on our food security and food sovereignty. Despite daily acknowledgements that Ontario rests on Indigenous lands, under treaty or unceded, the Indigenous principles of conservation of lands, and of sustainability for seven generations forward, are not part of this Bill. Food is grown, harvested, and processed in our communities and the lands and waters that surround them — our continued food security relies on us doing so in a sustainable manner. In the face of a rapidly changing climate and uncertain seasonal weather patterns, the disruption of complex wetland systems can have massive impacts on above- and below-ground waterways, and the production potential of adjacent agricultural lands. Further, disruptions to long food supply-chains, increased transportation expenses, crop failure in other parts of the world, and the need to limit our use of carbon-based fuels, require us to increase our food security by deepening our access to sustainably produced, locally grown food.
Individuals and families are also increasingly needing to choose between the rising costs of housing and the rising costs of food. Inflation and supply-chain disruption in recent years shines a light on the urgent need for both affordable housing and to protect all foodlands and farmlands as key components of our current and future food security. Relying heavily on urban sprawl as a solution, instead of densification, whittles too much of the already small share of land devoted to local agriculture. Urban sprawl solutions often means getting to food is harder to achieve, as transportation in newly developed, low-density communities is often inadequate or expensive.
The predictable, long-lasting consequences of this open assault rest on a falsehood: that we have to choose between protecting the land and building housing. Groups across Ontario, including groups focused on food and farming, have long presented reasonable, evidence- based options that demonstrate how we can both provide needed, affordable housing and conserve lands that are essential to build sustainable communities across the province for generations to come. In fact, many of the principles underlying the relevant existing policy structure and regulations (e.g the Provincial Policy Statement, Growth Plan) have worked toward the essential balance between housing and conservation—a balance that we must find in order to build sustainable communities.
Bill 23 erodes our food sovereignty, our food security, our democratic processes. Permanently protecting agricultural land in the province is crucial—once it’s lost to development, it is gone forever. ODPH urges the Government of Ontario to halt Bill 23 and re-start with guiding principles that balance the long-term mutually supportive needs for housing, ecological services and farmland protection, and adopt an inclusive, collaborative approach that targets liveable neighbourhoods, farmland protection, food security and participatory governance. ODPH would welcome the opportunity to provide feedback and further discussion related to this bill and its connection to food insecurity and sustainable, just, and resilient food systems.
Housing and food security must be planned for together.
Sincerely,
Laura Abbasi, RD
ODPH Executive Co-Chair
Year 1
Zoe Brenner, RD
ODPH Food Systems
Workgroup Co-Chair